Wednesday, November 21, 2007

The Hot Stove (I hate that term)

The offseason has begun in earnest. Let's start with the deals that have been signed, and then we'll talk about those that have just been loosely agreed upon, and those that are just "in the works."



  • The Phillies signed middle reliever J.C. Romero to a three-year contract extension for $12 million. The money doesn't bother me that much, although the Phils should really be looking at Romero's track record. The problem is a 3-year deal. Considering the fact that most relievers are essentially replaceable, and considering the fact that this knowledge is not a secret among baseball boardrooms, why are marginal relievers getting multi-year deals -- especially for more than two years? I can maybe understand extending an excellent reliever beyond his expiration date, but why would you do so with someone who is less than excellent? I guess some things people just never learn.

  • The Tigers traded Omar Infante to the Cubs for Jacque Jones. The Cubs have far too many outfielders, and Jones isn't their best option. I don't see that he does the Tigers a whole lot of good, either, since they're pretty well set with outfielders. I guess Jones isn't a bad 4th outfielder, at his price, but they'd better not think that he's an everyday player.
    As for Infante, he's a valuable guy, but he's not much of an improvement over what the Cubs had. And with Edgar Renteria, the Tigers didn't really need him that much. I don't know; maybe this deal was a draw.

  • The Cubs also sent away another outfielder, Craig Monroe. He wasn't doing them any good, and he won't make much difference for the Twins, either, who may have to non-tender him. I guess the Minnesota front office is still playing the game of "Left Fielder Russian Roulette."

  • The Astros traded Josh Anderson to the Braves for reliever/fringe starter Oscar Villarreal. The Astros don't need Anderson, who's a fifth outfielder, and neither do the Braves. The Braves may talk about keeping Anderson as their center fielder, but let's hope it's just talk. The Braves didn't really need Villarreal, but couldn't they have gotten more for him? The Astros, on the other hand, need some cheap guys to eat innings as a swingman.

  • The Blue Jays got Marco Scutaro from the A's for a pair of minor leaguers. This may be a sign that the A's are willing to trade anyone for a return. And while Scutaro is a useful guy, I don't relish the sight of a Scutaro/John McDonald pairing at shortstop.

  • The Mets signed Luis Castillo to a 4-year, $25 million contract. Whoaaa, there. Good ol' Omar's gonna regret this one mighty quick.

  • The Angels traded Orlando Cabrera to the White Sox for Jon Garland. I can understand this deal from the Angels' point of view. Garland is overpaid, but he's still a valuable #3-level pitcher. And though Cabrera is good, the Angels have some pretty good replacements for Cabrera. The addition of Garland gives the Angels a pretty crowded rotation, and that's always a good problem to have. It could mean that the Angels go into the season with an overstocked uber-rotation, or it could make one or two guys expendable if the right trade should come along.

  • The Braves signed Tom Glavine to a one-year deal. The deal is basically a nostalgia trip for both parties, as Glavine is essentially done. He's not going to be a reliable #3, but he could at least eat up some innings at the back end of the rotation. At least this way, the transition will be clear when Glavine wears an Atlanta hat to Cooperstown.

  • The Brewers traded Johnny Estrada to the Mets for Guillermo Mota. I don't really get this deal from the Brewers' point of view, but for the Mets, they get an aqequate place-filler behind the plate; someone who's not really any worse than Paul Lo Duca or Yorvit Torrealba and is infinitely cheaper.

  • The Indians signed Japanese free agent reliever Masahide Kobayashi to a two-year deal. I know nothing about Kobayashi, but from what I've heard, this is a good pick-up for Cleveland.

  • The Red Sox re-signed Mike Lowell to a 3-year deal. Apparently, the rumors of wealth and prosperity for Lowell in Philadelphia were overstated. So he stuck with the Sox for a bit more money than he's worth.

  • And finally, the Angels signed Torii Hunter to a 5-year deal for about $90 million, or $16 million.
    Wait a minute ...
    The Angels weren't on the short list of teams thought to be front-runners to land Hunter, but they took a giant leap forward in the negotiations and landed Hunter, perhaps the most sought-after free agent of the offseason.
    However ...
    Did the Angels overspend? Hunter is 32 now and will turn 33 next July. To sign him up through his age-36 season, what will the Angels get?
    They'll get a lifetime 271/324/469 hitter who, away from the friendly MetroDome, is easily a below-average hitter. Hunter has above-average power, but his batting average and especially his OBP more than counteract this. But it must be said that Hunter is a center fielder, and compared to other AL center fielders, his batting skill isn't so far from average.
    But wait a minute -- are the Angels paying $90 million to get an average center fielder in his decline years? They're also paying for elite defense, aren't they? If Hunter were the elite defender that is his reputation, this contract would be a bit more palatable. But he isn't. Hunter more than anyone has benefited from the modern development of the "web gem." It's always been true that flashier defenders get more credit than less flashy glove men of equal or better value, but nowhere has this been as true as with Hunter. Because of his circus catches, he's looked upon as a one-of-a-kind defender. But he has never been an elite center fielder, especially in terms of range. But he's been quite good. The trouble is his age; looking at several different defensive metrics, Hunter shows up somewhere around average defensively. So again, the Angels are dropping big money to a man in his 30s for what should be average production, and that's assuming that Hunter keeps doing as well as he did in Minnesota.
    The other problem is that the Angels are deploying a great deal of money and resources where it was not really needed. The Angels' outfield last year consisted mainly of Garret Anderson, Gary Matthews, and Vlad Guerrero. In fact, the most shocking thing about this deal is that it comes one year after the Matthews contract, another hideously misguided deal that was supposed to be a long-term solution to the center field question. They could shift Matthews to right field, Guerrero to DH, and start Hunter in center. But that would leave Juan Rivera, a talented hitter who's earned a lineup spot, out of a job. And it should be said that Rivera would be a much better right field solution than Matthews, but the latter's contract essentially precludes him from being moved. The same is true of Anderson, who's not any kind of left fielder anymore, but the Angels are stuck with their contract, and also stuck with Anderson as one of the faces of the franchise. So it will likely by Juan Rivera who's left out in the cold (or traded), even though he is, after Guerrero, the best hitter and the cheapest solution to the corner outfield problem.
    And again I must say that I'm stunned to see the Angels essentially admitting defeat with the Matthews deal, or at least showing themselves so willing to write off an expensive contract by shunting him over to an outfield corner, where he is far less valuable (you simply can't pay a corner outfielder $10 million a year to hit 252/323/419, or what Matthews hit in 2007, which is roughly in line with his career numbers).
    Arte Moreno has, since becoming owner of the Angels, shown himself as someone who is willing to spend big money to get the right players. That's been a successful policy, so long as he continues to spend it on the right players. If the Angels fall into the trap of spending big money on flashy free agents who end up as a drag on the payroll, they will no longer be a power to be reckoned with in the AL.
  • The White Sox are announcing a final agreement on a 4-year deal with reliever Scott Linebrink. If they go ahead with this, I'll lose a lot of respect for Kenny Williams. I've already written about the uselessness of giving 3+ years to less-than-stellar relievers, so I'll save some breath. But this also makes me think that the White Sox will not go gently into that good rebuilding process.

And here are the deals that are pretty much done, but have yet to be sealed:

  • The Yankee Three -- Alex Rodriguez, Jorge Posada, and Mariano Rivera -- all seem to have accepted their offers from the Yankees and will be returning next year. I said it before, but with Posada and Rivera especially, we shouldn't have given too much credence to their threats to leave the Yankees if Torre and/or A-Rod didn't come back.
  • Scott Boras came out recently and said that Andruw Jones will not be looking for a one-year contract this year. Some had speculated that Boras would use this tactic to get Andruw back on the market next year, when he would presumably have better stats to sell a long-term contract.
    I don't give Boras' comments any credence -- what idiot would, in the middle of negotiations, announce publicly that they'd be willing to give up and compromise? -- so this is another step in the Jones negotiations. My guess is that Boras isn't having any luck getting GMs to commit to a long-term offer, because they all think he's going to go for a one-year deal. He made this announcement to try and dislodge someone into giving Jones a multi-year offer. So in the end, I take this as a sign that the marketing of Andruw Jones isn't going well.
  • The Mets' deal with Yorvit Torrealba fell apart, and really -- that's a blessing in disguise for them.
  • Kenny Rogers severed his relationship with Scott Boras in what some have seen as a conciliatory move toward the Tigers. It seems that Rogers' most likely destinations are the Tigers or retirement. Although a story was floated about the possibility that Rogers would go back to the Rangers for the fourth time in his career. But given Rogers' stuff, he would be well-told to return to a pitcher's park such as Comerica in Detroit.
  • The Brewers agreed to a one-year deal with Jason Kendall. Kendall isn't anyone's ideal catcher, but considering what was available this offseason, I think Kendall is a good signing for a small-market team that wants to contend, and the contract sounds like low enough money that it won't be a hardship. And there's always the chance that Kendall still has some bounceback in him.

And now for all the rest:

  • Rumors have circulated for a while that the Cubs are targeting former Rockies second baseman Kaz Matsui as a free agent. Many Cub fans have subsequently expressed their hope that this remains a rumor.
  • The Royals have expressed some interest in Jose Guillen. I think Guillen is talented and perhaps underrated, but he's not a guy for a team like the Royals. He will come too expensive and not be the difference between making and not making the playoffs.
  • It will be interesting to see how the Torii Hunter signing affects the Angels' efforts to acquire talent via trade. Before they signed Torii, the Angels were considered favorites to land Miguel Cabrera. Now, with a big piece added to the lineup, the Angels may back off somewhat. (Hunter doesn't remotely compare to Cabrera in terms of offense added, but the Angels might think he does). It's also possible that the Angels keep moving and get Cabrera anyhow. That would make their outfield/DH situation even more problematic when Cabrera has to move off third base (which will be soon). The sad thing is that the Angels might take the same route as the Dodgers and replace all their young and productive players with guys who are much older and much less valuable, money-wise. It would suck if the Halos tried to solve their outfield logjam by trading someone like Juan Rivera or Casey Kotchman instead of ditching a gigantic money drain like Matthews or Anderson.
  • The Johan Santana sweepstakes is heating up. I'm less of a hard-liner than some of my fellow sabermetricians here -- I'd be much more likely to give up value to get someone as good as Santana, especially if I really needed him. The problem, of course, is that he'll probably go to someone like the Dodgers, who have several nearly-as-good pitchers making the league minimum in the minors.
    The key here may be the Mets, who have a strong need to win now, a strong base of money and market to support the $20-25 million per it would take to keep him, and a strong sense of desperation that would lead the front office to act rashly. Player agents must get physically aroused by a desperate General Manager, and I see Omar Minaya as someone who is a) pretty desperate, b) willing to overspend to get what he wants, and c) facing a lot of pressure to do something from the fans and media. Add it up, and if I were Johan's agent, I'd put Omar on my Christmas card list. I'd also look up the Bartolo Colon trade and try to get history to repeat itself.
  • The Orioles seem pretty desperate to unload Miguel Tejada. If I were a team that needed a third baseman, I'd look pretty hard at Miguel. I think he'd bounce back in a better environment, and even if the Orioles pick up just 15-20% of his contract, he'd be a good bargain, provided he can turn things around. I should point out, though, that Tejada's first years in Baltimore were big successes. The image of him as a failure comes mainly from this year's performance (296/357/442) and his sagging defense. But if he could give those numbers just a little boost back to their former levels (career 287/344/477 in pitchers' parks) and provide adequate defense at third, he'd be a really good deal, well worth a couple of "B" prospects, especially if you're a team (:cough: TWINS :cough:) that could really use him.

Things should keep developing, as the offseason hot stove (there's that phrase again) should heat up as quickly as it did last year.

Saturday, November 17, 2007

Potential Free Agents

First Base:
Sean Casey
Tony Clark
Jeff Conine
Shea Hillenbrand
Eric Hinske
Ryan Klesko
Doug Mientkiewicz
Olmedo Saenz
Mark Sweeney
Mike Sweeney
------------------
Not a lot of very attractive options here. There are some potential platoon partners here and a couple decent gloves, but no one you'd want to plan on as your full-time first baseman.
Tony Clark might be then best pick of the bunch, but the market seems to agree, and he may end up getting more money than you'd want to spend on an aging platoon first baseman.

Second Base:
Mark Bellhorn
Geoff Blum
Miguel Cairo
Luis Castillo
Marcus Giles
Tony Graffanino
Jerry Hairston, Jr.
Tadahito Iguchi
Mark Loretta
Kaz Matsui
Jose Valentin
Todd Walker
----------------
I see here a bevy of minor league contracts. Kaz Matsui will probably get the biggest contract of the bunch, and he should donate some portion of that to the maintenance of Coors Field. Luis Castillo should get some interest, but his skills are declining, and when Luis Castillo's speed, defense and batting average deteriorate, there ain't a lot left. Tadahito Iguchi is probably the best bet here, but there could also be some useful guys here coming off the bench.

Shortstops:
Royce Clayton
David Eckstein
Cesar Izturis
Neifi Perez
------------------
Ouch. Major ouch. David Eckstein won't break the bank, but he'll be the one to get a big payday here, even though his scrappiness is not substitute for good production at shortstop.

Third Base:
Aaron Boone
Russel Branyan
Jeff Cirillo
Pedro Feliz
Corey Koskie
Mike Lamb
Mike Lowell
-------------------
There are some better options here, although things drop off after Lowell, which is why he's being pursued so strongly. Some rumors came out recently (which may or may not have been accurate) that the Yankees had offered Lowell a contract to be their first baseman. I thought that was the most bass-ackwards thing I'd heard in some time. Why in the hell would you sign Lowell, a great defender, and stick him at third, when A-Rod and his fringe-average defense remain at third? Let's hope these discussions really didn't take place, and that Lowell will be headed to the Phillies or the Red Sox, instead.
The Giants pulled out of the Pedro Felix sweepstakes, saying that they weren't ready to go much more than one year. Feliz is a good glove at third with some pop, but damn he makes some outs. The knucklehead that signs Feliz to a long-term deal deserves the ensuing headache.
Mike Lamb's name has popped up, as a four-corners (1B, 3B, LF, RF) player who's done quite well as a part-timer in Houston. Some team looking for left-handed offense off the bench or as a platoon in a corner would do well to pick up Lamb, who can still hit.

Outfield:
Barry Bonds
Milton Bradley
Mike Cameron
Jeff DaVanon
Darin Erstad
Cliff Floyd
Luis Gonzalez
Shawn Green
Jose Guillen
Torii Hunter
Geoff Jenkins
Andruw Jones
Bobby Kielty
Kenny Lofton
Rob Mackowiak
Trot Nixon
Corey Patterson
Aaron Rowand
Reggie Sanders
Sammy Sosa
Shannon Stewart
Brad Wilkerson
Preston Wilson
----------------------
There are a lot of center fielders out there, but the bidding is going to be so fierce that the last man standing after the other stars sign shoul make a lot of money from a desperate team. Of the three big names -- Andruw Jones, Torii Hunter and Aaron Rowand -- only Jones would provide any real return on an investment, as his terrible 2007 has lowered his price tag. Hunter and Rowand are vastly overrated, with Rowand especially coming off a career year.
Those looking for a more reasonable outfield solution would do well to take a flyer on someone like Mike Cameron (suspension and all), Brad Wilkerson, Corey Patterson, and especially Milton Bradley. Whomever gets Bradley this offseason may look smarter than anyone in a year's time.
Luis Gonzalez, Reggie Sanders, Sammy Sosa and Shawn Green are the big veterans available. Green is useless, as you can get his production from much cheaper, younger sources. Gonzalez is still an above-average hitter, and I for one didn't think that his 1-year contract with the Dodgers was such a bad idea after all. Another one-year deal for a team that needs to win now wouldn't be a bad idea.
I don't trust Reggie Sanders' health, so I wouldn't pursue him. And Sosa just wasn't good at all last year, and a poor-hitting DH at his age shouldn't go around demanding big money as a free agent.
Jose Guillen may have been implicated in the latest PED scandal, but there still appears to be a thriving market for him. I don't really but it. Guillen is good, but his performance on and off the field is unreliable. He's also getting older and can't carry the offensive burden that comes with being a right fielder. He'd be best used as a short-term fix for a win-now team. (In other words, the Royals should back off.)

Catcher:
Rod Barajas
Michael Barrett
Jason Kendall
Paul Lo Duca
Damian Miller
Jose Molina
Mike Piazza
Yorvit Torrealba
----------------------
This is a pretty bare group to choose from, especially since Piazza isn't a catcher anymore. The best bet by far is Michael Barrett, who should come fairly cheap after a star-crossed 2007. He should be the first stop for teams with a hole at catcher, but instead several GMs are focusing on Yorvit Torrealba for reasons as yet unknown.

Starting Pitcher:
Tony Armas
Kris Benson
Matt Clement
Bartolo Colon
Josh Fogg
Tom Glavine
Livan Hernandez
Jason Jennings
Jon Lieber
Kyle Lohse
Rodrigo Lopez
Eric Milton
Odalis Perez
Andy Pettitte
Kenny Rogers
Carlos Silva
John Thomson
Brett Tomko
Steve Trachsel
Jeff Weaver
David Wells
Kip Wells
Randy Wolf
Jaret Wright
---------------------
A sorry spectacle, it's true. Pettitte is the best option, but he's made it clear that it's the Yankees or nothing for him. After him, there are two main groups of free agents: reliably fringe-average guys (Carlos Silva, Josh Fogg, Jason Jennings, Kris Benson, Livan Hernandez, Eric Milton) and high-risk/high-reward types (Bartolo Colon, Matt Clement, Randy Wolf). Personally, I'd take one from the latter group, since they're not likely to get as much money as the former.

Relief Pitchers:
Jon Adkins
Jeremy Affeldt
Armando Benitez
Micah Bowie
Doug Brocail
Francisco Cordero
Octavio Dotel
Eric Gagne
Eddie Guardado
LaTroy Hawkins
Jorge Julio
Scott Linebrink
Troy Percival
Mariano Rivera
Kirk Saarloos
Rudy Seanez
Luis Vizcaino
Kerry Wood
Mike Wood
---------------------
Both Rivera and Cordero are lining up for a pretty big payday, and that's as should be. But there will also be some guys who could get surprisingly good money to be a spare middle reliver; guys like Eric Gagne, Kerry Wood, Octavio Dotel, and Troy Percival.

Friday, November 16, 2007

Preseason Picks revisited

Well, the time has come to look back at my picks and selections from the 2007 postseason and see how I did.

Here's what I predicted for the NL EAST:

New York (93-69), 91-95 win range
Philadelphia* (87-75), 85-89 win range
Florida (82-80), 80-84 win range
Atlanta (80-82), 78-82 win range
Washington (68-94), 66-70 win range

And here's what really happened:

Philadelphia (89-73) +2 wins
New York (88-74) -5 wins
Atlanta (84-78) +4 wins
Washington (73-89) +5 wins
Florida (71-91) -11 wins

Well, two of the teams (Philadelphia and Atlanta) fell within my Win Range, if just on the edge. I missed the Mets by 5 wins on the nose and the Nationals by 5 as well. The Marlins were the team I missed big on. I figured they would at least consolidate some of their success from 2006 and move forward. But while the lineup did move forward, the pitching staff completely fell apart. Thus I -- along with many other commentators -- misjudged the Marlins. And it should be said that I was more favorable to the Nationals than many people, who put them well in the 100-loss territory.

My NL CENTRAL:
St. Louis (86-76), 84-88 win range
Milwaukee (83-79), 81-85 win range
Chicago (78-84), 76-80 win range
Cincinnati (78-84), 76-80 win range
Houston (75-87), 73-77 win range
Pittsburgh (69-93), 67-71 win range

And here's what really happened:

Chicago (85-77), +7 wins
Milwaukee (83-79), Perfect!
St. Louis (78-84), -8 wins
Houston (73-89), -2 wins
Cincinnati (72-90), -6 wins
Pittsburgh (68-94), -1 win

Boy, I had the Brewers pegged: 83-79 and in 2nd place. Of course, I did a big switcheroo with the #1 and #3 teams. I just figured that the Cardinals would be able to get together like they always seemed to do, but boy they didn't. I was equally wrong about the Cubs and was certainly biased by my distaste for their offseason spending spree.
I fit both the Pirates and Astros within my Win Range, but just missed on Cincinnati. I was more optimistic about the Reds' chances, especially with Homer Bailey added to what appeared to be an improved pitching staff. But none of the rookies were really able to make an impact in 2007, and guys I was counting on (like Bronson Arroyo) didn't come through.

My NL WEST:
Los Angeles (94-68), 92-96 win range
Arizona (85-77), 83-87 win range
San Diego (84-78), 82-86 win range
Colorado (78-84), 80-82 win range
San Francisco (73-89), 71-75 win range

And the real NL West:
Arizona (90-72), +5 wins
Colorado (90-73), +12 wins
San Diego (89-74), +5 wins
Los Angeles (82-80), -12 wins
San Francisco (71-91), -2 wins

How convenient that my two biggest mistakes should come in the same division. Only one team (the Giants) fell within my win range, but I was close enough on Arizona and San Diego; I really just misjudged how good the entire division would be.
My big slight was on the Rockies, who did 12 wins better than I expected (call it 11, since I didn't predict Game #163). Either way, I missed big time. All I can say for myself is that I knew all about the Rockies' good young players, but I just never thought it was really going to come together. I also thought that, while they'd be competitive, they wouldn't be the best in the division ...
Which brings me to the Dodgers. I thought the Dodgers would be the best team in the National League, but they screwed most of that up by doing a terrible job of utilizing what resources they had. Grady Little takes some of the blame, but the real onus is on GM Ned Colletti and his staff for signing a lot of expendable players to contracts that guaranteed them playing time and also blocked cheaper, more productive youngsters. The Dodgers did have some real problems that I didn't anticipate, but their real issue wasn't a baseball problem, it was an intelligence problem.

My AL EAST:
New York (96-66), 94-98 win range
Boston (91-71), 89-93 win range
Toronto (88-74), 86-90 win range
Baltimore (75-87), 73-77 win range
Tampa Bay (69-93), 67-71 win range

The real thing:
Boston (96-66), +5 wins
New York (94-68), -2 wins
Toronto (83-79), -5 wins
Baltimore (69-93), -6 wins
Tampa Bay (66-96), -3 wins

I wasn't really close or really far away with any of these picks. I remember being skeptical of all the question marks surrounding Boston but, as you're no doubt aware, that all turned out fine. The Yankees weren't quite as good as I'd anticipated, and maybe I was just used to picking the Yankees #1. I had some high hopes for Toronto staying in the race, but they fell back once again. I think I've learned my lesson about giving the Blue Jays the benefit of the doubt -- and the same goes doubly for Baltimore and Tampa Bay.

My AL CENTRAL:
Cleveland (94-68), 92-96 win range
Minnesota (93-69), 91-95 win range
Detroit (90-72), 88-92 win range
Chicago (88-74), 86-90 win range
Kansas City (63-99), 61-65 win range

Reality:
Cleveland (96-66), +2 wins
Detroit (88-74), -2 wins
Minnesota (79-83), -14 wins
Chicago (72-90), -16 wins
Kansas City (69-93), +6 wins

So that's two within the win range, one just off . . . and two horrible blunders. One, Minnesota, I can't really blame myself for. With Johan Santana, a crop of good young pitchers, a solid bullpen, and the same lineup from last year, how could they not succeed? That's a good question, and one that we should think about the next time we try to beatify Terry Ryan. The pitching wasn't quite as good, and the lineup was much worse. In fact, the lineup was so foreseeably bad that I felt some of the problems would get solved before the end of the season. My mistake.
Speaking of which, I should have listened to PECOTA and cast a skeptical eye at the White Sox. But I wouldn't listen, and it cost me 16 flippin' wins, my worst performance among all the preseason predictions.

My AL WEST:
Los Angeles (94-68), 92-96 win range
Oakland (92-70), 90-94 win range
Texas (84-78), 82-86 win range
Seattle (72-90), 70-74 win range

Reality:
Los Angeles (94-68), Perfect!
Seattle (88-74), +16 wins
Oakland (76-86), -16 wins
Texas (75-87), -9 wins

Yeeeeeoouuucch. I got the Angels prediction right, but even though hindsight is 20/20 and all that, I should have been more skeptical of Oakland. But I stand by my prediction for Seattle; that 88-win crap is some kind of voodoo. As for Texas, I thought they were taking a step forward in 2007. On the bright side, they did take a step forward at the minor league level.

And finally, here are my awards votes and postseason predictions:

NL:
MVP: Albert Pujols
He had an off year; he was just one of the 10 best players in the league. The final vote will be announced soon, and Albert should get some support for the middle of the ballot.
Cy Young: Jake Peavy
Thank you; you're too kind.
Rookie of the Year: Chris Young, Arizona
Well, Young did play good defense and hit for power. Other than that, though, he looked horribly raw. The best he'll get is a sympathy 3rd-place vote.
NLDS: Dodgers over Phillies; Cardinals over Mets
As it turns out, I only got one of the four NL playoff teams right. That was the Phillies. But at least I was correct in predicting that the Phillies would exit in the first round.
NLCS: Dodgers over Cardinals
If either team had made the postseason, I think the Dodgers would have been favored.
WS: (see AL results)

AL:
MVP: Travis Hafner
I predicted that the Indians would be the inspirational playoff team in the AL this year, and I was right there. I also predicted that they would be led by another banner year from Hafner, whose enormous RBI totals would net him the MVP. But Hafner was just good rather than great, and the Indians will have to settle from getting pitching hardware only. None of their position players will get big support in the MVP voting, although Victor Martinez should get some decent support.
Cy Young: Johan Santana
This is never a bold choice. By my figuring, Santana was the 3rd-best pitcher in the AL this year, but he didn't even do that well in the voting, because even though he was still very good, he was well below expectations.
Rookie of the Year: Alex Gordon, Royals
This was the fashionable choice, along with Daisuke Matsuzaka. But Gordon won't even sniff a vote, unless a KC voter gets generous and lists him 3rd. Gordon got better as the season wore on, but his MLB debut was rocky at best. The field this year was full of players who weren't expected to contend earlier in the year; some may have expected big things from Dustin Pedroia, but who has putting forth names like Hideki Okajima, Brian Bannister, and Jeremy Guthrie in the preseason polls?
ALDS: Yankees over Twins; Indians over Angels
I got three of the AL postseason teams right, although it's worth noting that the team I missed ended up winning the whole damn thing. The Indians/Angels matchup never happened, but I would have favored the Indians there anyhow.
ALCS: Yankees over Indians
This one actually took place in the first round, and the Indians won. I guess in the preseason I had higher hopes for Yankee pitching.
WS: Yankees over Dodgers
I went for a revival of an age-old feud. It didn't work out, but it wasn't an unreasonable prediction to start the season.

And thus we have to wait for next season and hope I can do a much better job next time.

Awards Wrap-up

BEST NL OFFENSE: Philadelphia Phillies
Even taking into account their friendly ballpark, the Phillies had the best offensive attack in the NL. If they had a third baseman worth a damn, their infield would have been historically great, with Ryan Howard, Chase Utley, and Jimmy Rollins all having fine years. The outfield wasn't great, but it was solid enough, thanks in large part to a career year by center fielder Aaron Rowand (309/374/515). Other than third base, catcher was the Phillies' biggest problem, but they finally ended up having Carlos Ruiz (259/340/396) as their everyday starter, and he wasn't too bad.
All in all, the Phillies ranked 1st in the NL in Runs Scored (892), first in Equivalent Average (.276), and first in slugging percentage (.458). The 2nd-place team in runs scored was Colorado with 860, and no one else had more than 810. But this exaggerates the Phillies' real level of quality. Looking at EQA, the Phillies were just slightly better than the Mets (.272) and the Marlins (.270), two teams whose park effects dampen their raw offensive totals.

2nd place: New York, 3rd place: Florida

BEST AL OFFENSE: New York Yankees
No surprise here, as the Yankees turned the American League into their own private Romper Room. Not only did they lead the league in runs (968), they did so by a huge margin, with the Tigers second with 887. And this was for real; the Yanks' .280 EQA was nine points better than Detroit's .271. The Yanks also led the league in HR (201) and all three "slash" categories: AVG (.290), OBP (.366), and SLG (.463).
Even though they lacked a true first baseman, the Yankees eventually made up the difference by putting Jason Giambi at first (an ugly sight defensively, but an offensive asset) and shifting Johnny Damon to DH, with good-glove Melky Cabrera playing center. This got nine above-average hitters into the lineup. The Yankees not only had the league MVP in the middle of their lineup, he was surrounded by a lot of quality hitters.
2nd place: Detroit, 3rd place: Boston

BEST NL PITCHING STAFF: San Diego Padres
This seems like the default answer, since the Padres' ERA (3.70) led the league by a fair amount (Arizona was 2nd at 4.04). But when you take ballparks into account, this actually becomes a close race between three teams: the Padres, Diamondbacks, and (believe it or not) the Cubs.
The Padres' 3.70 ERA was due in large part to Petco Park, the friendliest pitcher's park in baseball. Their ERA+, which takes this into account, was 112. This also casts a shadow on their 119 home runs allowed, the lowest in the league. Even their impressive strikeout:walk ratio -- 1136 strikeouts that rank them 5th in the NL and a league-best 474 walks -- can't be taken at face value.
Even so, the Padres had a genuinely great pitching staff, Petco or not. Jake Peavy was the league's best pitcher, and Chris Young wasn't too far behind. Their rotation was complemented by a good Greg Maddux and a decent young Justin Germano. But what really held them together was the bullpen; not so much closer Trevor Hoffman (2.98 ERA in 57.1 IP), but middle reliever Heath Bell (2.02 ERA and 102 K in 93.2 IP) and several others.

But it must be said that the Diamondbacks weren't far behind. Their team ERA of 4.04 was actually better than the Padres', ballparks considered (Arizona's ERA+ was 114, tops in the NL). The Diamondbacks allowed more homers and more walks, and got fewer strikeouts than the Padres, though. And even though the D-Backs had a fine bullpen and a true ace in Brandon Webb, the back end of their rotation (Doug Davis, Livan Hernandez, Micah Owings) was decent at best.
The Cubs enter the discussion thanks to an ERA+ of 113 that's just a bit worse than Arizona's and just a bit better than San Diego's. They also led the league in strikeouts, with 1,211. So how can we decide between these three?
My vote goes to San Diego. Their adjusted ERA is 3rd in the NL, but it's very close. And their Run Average (which allows for all runs) is the best in the league once again. They didn't lead the league in K's like Chicago, but their K:BB ratio was much the best among all three teams. Quibble if you will, but I'll take the Friars.
Honorable mention goes to the Colorado Rockies, who finished 4th in my rankings. That may not sound impressive, but it's the best pitching staff Colorado's ever had, and they're not too far behind the top 3.
2nd place: Chicago, 3rd place: Arizona

BEST AL PITCHING STAFF: Boston Red Sox
I doubt that anyone who saw the postseason would argue. The Red Sox led the AL in ERA (3.87), Adjusted ERA (118) and Run Average (4.11), which is influenced by their fine defense. The Sox were a close 3rd in the AL in strikeouts (1149, just behind the Devil Rays and Angels) and only four teams allowed fewer walks (482).
the second-best pitching staff, believe it or not, belonged to the Toronto Blue Jays. The Jays were 2nd in the AL in ERA (4.00) and ERA+ (116) and had a K:BB almost as good as Boston. But the Jays weren't quite good enough, nor did they have as much depth as the World Champs.
2nd place: Toronto, 3rd place: Cleveland

OZZIE GUILLEN AWARD (NL): Miguel Olivo.
123 strikeouts, 14 walks. What else do you need to know?
Other Candidates: Chris Young, Alfonso Soriano, Jeff Francoeur, Khalil Greene

OZZIE GUILLEN AWARD (AL): Delmon Young
It's amazing that anyone actually voted for this guy as the Rookie of the Year. Don't get me wrong; he's got potential, we just didn't see a lot of it this year. Instead, we saw a guy who hit 288/316/408 with 127 strikeouts and 26 walks. If you play every day and draw 26 walks, you're not going to be a star. Here's hoping that Young, who is very talented, improves his plate discipline, but not everyone I've heard from thinks he'll do much better next year.
Other candidates: Brandon Inge, Alex Gordon, Josh Fields

HARD-LUCK PITCHER AWARD (AL): Gil Meche
No AL pitcher was really unlucky this season. But if I had to pick a guy, I'd go with Meche. He actually had a pretty decent season, giving the Royals 156 strikeouts in 216 innings with a career-best 3.67 ERA. His win-loss record? 9-13. This is what happens when you sign with the Royals.

HARD-LUCK PITCHER AWARD (NL): Matt Cain
Poor Matt Cain. People should be excited by a 22-year-old pitcher who throws 200 innings 163 strikeouts and a 3.64 ERA. He showed strong improvement over last year's numbers and is one of the Giants' best players. But when all of your offensive support is Barry Bonds, who also happens to be the only quote coming out of San Francisco nowadays, it's bad luck. Even worse is when your team hands you a 7-16 record for your troubles.

THE JIM ROSS "HOSS" AWARD (NL): Heath Bell
I mentioned Bell earlier, but just to recap: 93.2 relief innings, 2.02 ERA, and a 102:30 K:BB ratio. Judging by VORP (39.7), Bell was actually the most valuable relief pitcher in the NL, even including the closers, despite the fact that he only saved 2 games. (In fact, middle-man Carlos Marmol actually finished with more VORP, 34.5, than any team's closer).

THE JIM ROSS "HOSS" AWARD (AL): C.C. Sabathia
The "Hoss" Award is not meant to be a pejorative reference to anyone's particular body size. But none the less, it's about time C.C. won this award, and he took it home with a Cy Young-caliber performance in 241 league-leading innings.

THE EYE-POPPER AWARD (NL): Miguel Olivo's .262 OBP
Boy, you hit 16 homers and coax along some pitchers, and they let you get away with anything . . .

THE EYE-POPPER AWARD (AL): Carlos Pena's 46 HR, .627 SLG
It's not the numbers so much that are eye-popping but rather that the player who put them up was waiver bait just a year ago.

THE GREATEST SEASON NO ONE NOTICED (NL): Heath Bell
See above.

THE GREATEST SEASON NO ONE NOTICED (AL): David Ortiz
I know what you're thinking: "how could you not notice David Ortiz -- either in a real or statistical sense?" But most of the season was spent talking about how Ortiz's power numbers were down and how he was all ache-y. Ortiz's home run numbers were down; he hit "just" 35, the least since he hit 31 in 2003, his inaugural season in Boston. And he "only" drove in 117 RBIs, compared to last year's 137.
I say "big schmeal." Ortiz also nearly doubled his doubles total from last year; he smacked a career-high 52 two-baggers this year, compared with just 29 last year. He lowered his strikeout total to 103, his lowest total in a full season of playing time, while still drawing 111 walks (only last year's 119 were better). This, together with a monstrously high .332 batting average (his previous career high was .301 in 2004) gave him the best OBP in the entire league, an incredible .445. He also -- in what was supposed to be a "down" year -- led the entire league in Equivalent Average, at .339 (Alex Rodriguez's EQA was .338). Equivalent Average basically tells us who the best hitter in the league was, adjusted for league, ballpark, and position. In short, David Ortiz was the best hitter -- if not the best player -- in the American League in 2007.
And who would have thought that David Ortiz being the league's top hitter would go unnoticed?

THE OVERRATED AWARD -- the player, not the award itself (NL): Jimmy Rollins
I already discussed this a bit in my MVP section, but if you're going to try that "he ignites the offense" and "he plays every day" crap around me, please bring along a bucket so I can up-chuck. Jimmy Rollins is quite a good player, but it's wishful thinking and mythology to cast him as the league's best player. He's not the MVP; he's the MVS: Most Valuable to Sportswriters, because he's such an interesting player. If you're really into Jimmy Rollins' story and become aroused when you see someone get their uniform dirty, that's fine. Just not around here; I just ate.
(And yes, I have been looking for an excuse to use the term "up-chuck.")


THE OVERRATED AWARD -- the player, not the award itself (AL): Nick Punto
No one in the AL was really that overrated this year, which is good news. So I'll pick on Nick Punto. Punto wasn't overrated in the traditional sense; it's not that he was said to be a good player and wasn't. It's that very little was said about him despite the fact that he was a historically awful player.
Nick Punto had one of the worst full seasons ever by a third baseman. Several other sites have outlined the particulars of Punto's awfuldom, but here it is in a nutshell: 210/291/271 in 472 ABs. 1 HR. 90 strikeouts. 0 FRAA. There is no, no, no, NO, NO excuse for a team to tolerate such execrable production from an offensively important position (or any position, really). Teams usually use a player this awful out of necessity in a pinch or because they haven't yet realized the extent of his awfulness. The Twins have neither excuse; there are always better options than Punto, and it shouldn't take you 472 at-bats to realize that.

Thursday, November 15, 2007

A-Rod and Barry

Well, this isn't what I was expecting. It looks like Alex Rodriguez has definitely come to a preliminary agreement with the Yankees on a 10-year, $275 million contract. This is basically the same offer the Yankees extended to A-Rod in the days before he opted out of his contract, except it's actually less -- the Yankees have subtracted the money they would have gotten from the Rangers as part of the old contract. So for all intents and purposes, A-Rod will be returning to the Yankees next year and will be a Yankee for the foreseeable future.
The Yankees negotiated this contract directly with A-Rod -- the Steinbrothers refused to negotiate with Scott Boras.
There are a lot of implications here, and to discuss them, I'll whip out my bullets:
  • Boras. This is a tremendous embarrassment for Scott Boras, as he had staked most of his reputation and mystique on his ability to break the bank again with A-Rod. The problem isn't so much that Boras was universally excoriated for the manner and timing of A-Rod's opting out; being despised doesn't seem to bother Boras. The problem is that his aura as the ultimate super-agent has been punctured.
    You could certainly say that this isn't such a setback for Boras. Similar things have happened in the past, such as when Andruw Jones bypassed him to negotiate a contract extension with the Braves. But Boras hadn't staked his reputation on Andruw Jones, and neither had the Jones negotiations become a sports media extravaganza. And, of course, Atlanta is not New York, and Andruw Jones is not A-Rod.
    So even if you argue that it's just the perception of Boras that's been hurt, I would say that it's that same perception that sets Boras apart from every other agent. That perception is what makes players seek out Boras to get them a bigger payday than any other agent could secure. And when Boras convinced A-Rod to opt out (which seems to be what happened), he did so knowing that it was make-or-break time for his reputation as a king-maker. And it's only A-Rod's willingness to go back to the Yankees hat in hand that's saved Boras from a real embarassment.
    It's also been suggested that, in the weeks and days leading up to the opt-out announcement, Boras wasn't entirely honest with A-Rod with his assessment of the situation. And this could be the most problematic thing of all; Boras has made a living getting players to believe that they're better than anyone else thinks they are and that if they trust him, they'll get that payday. If his clients (or, especially, prospective clients) start doubting either of these things, it will be that much harder for him to seel his agency based solely on his reputation.
  • A-Rod. Somehow, A-Rod has managed to emerge from this with some degree of honor intact. That's not to say that the New York fans won't give him hell -- I don't picture his life on the field being that pleasant until the Yankees win the World Series -- but he didn't come out of this story as the villain.
    According to Buster Olney, A-Rod really felt like he was misled by Boras into thinking that teams would be lining up to pay him $300 million. He was also, reportedly, furious at the timing of the opt-out announcement, which hurt his cause immensely. It came to the point where A-Rod saw Boras, at least temporarily, as a hindrance rather than a help, and swallowed some pride on his way back to talk to the Yankees. The fact that Scott Boras would even allow A-Rod to enter such high-profile negotiations without him is a sign of how much of a hit he's taken.
  • The Yankees. PR-wise, the Yankees are the clear winners. I'm not so happy that they went back on their word about not negotiating with A-Rod if he opted out, but technically, they can get around that by saying that they were just offering him the same deal (roughly) as before, and that it was Scott Boras who they wouldn't negotiate with.
    Money-wise, I don't like the fact that this is for 10 years at all. A-Rod's contract makes more sense for the Yankees than it does for anyone else, but it's still not a good idea to subsidize someone into their 40's at $25 million per.
Oh, and as you may have heard, Barry Bonds was indicted today by a federal grand jury in San Francisco on 4 counts of perjury and 1 count of obstruction of justice.
I really don't have much to say about this that I haven't said before, but it does look like Barry's baseball career is over, and this may be the final straw that keeps him out of Cooperstown. Especially if there really is some new evidence of a positive drug test uncovered by the prosecutors.
I can't see any team risking $10 million+ to a recently-indicted player who may spend a fair amount of the season in court.
UPDATE:
Just to add a few thoughts after reading more about the issue.
  • My understanding is that since the prosecutors have decided to indict after all this time, there must be some new piece of evidence that's changed their minds. I highly doubt (thought it's not impossible) that the prosecutors would indict now, with little or no new evidence gathered over the past two years and face the wrath of a malicious prosecution lawsuit. Of course, if they don't have any new evidence, such a lawsuit may in fact be justified.
  • Even though I did speculate that Bonds' career is over, I highly doubt that he will be convicted. If there is some damning evidence against him, we'll most likely see him plea to a lesser charge and skip a trial. If there is no damning evidence against him, then it's obviously difficult to imagine him being convicted.
    The trouble is that the main counts against him are the perjury counts, and perjury is hard to prove. The prosecution has to prove that Bonds knowingly took performance-enhancing drugs before or during the time he testified otherwise. A positive test for PEDs (which is referred to in the indictment) does not prove perjury. If Bonds claims (as Gary Sheffield so cunningly did) that he may have been given the drugs without his knowledge, that's a very difficult claim to dispute. It would have to secure testimony from either Bonds (unlikely) or the person who provided the drugs to prove that he knew what he was taking. And even then, if someone comes forward and testifies that they provided Bonds with PEDs and that he knew what they were, that person would really need corroboration to be a convincing witness. Without corroboration, they can be dismantled on cross-examination, particularly if they're a shady character (and if they're giving out steroids, they probably are).
    Whether or not Bonds knowingly took PEDs is a question for you to decide. To prove that he did in court is much more difficult, and I haven't seen anything yet to suggest that the government can do so. If they have some new, secret magic evidence to prove such a thing, then great, but I highly doubt that they do.
  • If Bonds is acquitted of this charge in court, or if the charges are dismissed, then the government's plan has actually backfired, because then Bonds will have faced his charges in court and defeated them. Buster Olney drew a parallel between Bonds and the 1919 White Sox, who were also acquitted in court, but were still suspended for life by Commissioner Landis. That's a faulty-ass parallel, because if baseball had a strong labor union in 1919, that suspension would never fly (and hell, if baseball had a strong labor union in 1919, Landis probably wouldn't have taken the job in the first place). Also, the Black Sox players were not as independently wealthy as Bonds and actually had a good many of their legal bills fronted by Charlie Comiskey. Bonds can buy very good lawyers who could, in concert with the players' union, tear Bud Selig to pieces if he even contemplated a suspension. Without a conviction (and possibly even with one), Barry Bonds will not be suspended from baseball.

Monday, November 12, 2007

My Awards 2007

Earlier today, Ryan Braun and Dustin Pedroia were named the 2007 NL and AL Rookies of the Year. Do I agree with these picks? How do I feel about the other candidates? Read on to find out!:

American League MVP: Alex Rodriguez
There's really no comparison. A-Rod hit 314/422/645 in over 700 plate appearances while playing an adequate third base (although the latter is debatable). He sported a .338 EQA and led the league with 96.7 VORP. Here's how he compares to the rest of the league (bold indicates league leader):
A-Rod: 314/422/645; .338 EQA, 54 HR, 95 BB, 3 FRAA, 96.7 VORP
Magglio Ordonez: 363/434/595, .335 EQA, 28 HR, 76 BB, -4 FRAA, 87.8 VORP
Jorge Posada: 338/426/543, .322 EQA, 20 HR, 74 BB, -4 FRAA, 73.4 VORP
David Ortiz: 332/445/521, .339 EQA, 35 HR, 111 BB, 0 FRAA, 86.2 VORP
Ordonez can nearly match A-Rod's offensive output, but not quite; and we should also consider a) that A-Rod plays a more valuable defensive position, and b) Yankee Stadium hurts A-Rod more than Comerica Park hurs Maggs.
David Ortiz can match, or even possibly exceed, A-Rod's production. But Ortiz doesn't have quite as many plate appearances, and of course he had zero defensive value.
No arguments here, and I think A-Rod will win handily.
Here's my top 10:
1. Alex Rodriguez, New York Yankees
2. Magglio Ordonez, Detroit Tigers
3. Jorge Posada, New York Yankees
4. David Ortiz, Boston Red Sox
5. Curtis Granderson, Detroit Tigers
6. Ichiro Suzuki, Seattle Mariners
7. Carlos Pena, Tampa Bay Devil Rays
8. C.C. Sabathia, Cleveland Indians
9. Vladimir Guerrero, Los Angeles Angels
10. Victor Martinez, Cleveland Indians
National League MVP: David Wright
Except for the more intellectual analysts like Rob Neyer and Keith Law, Wright's name has gotten little or no mention in the mainstream media. So it's up to me to prove Wright's case. I'll save some time by just showing you the criteria I used to make my decision.
Here's Wright compared to the other candidates:
David Wright, NYM (325/416/546, .329 EQA, 11 FRAA, 30 HR, 94 BB, 604 ABs, 81.1 VORP)
Jimmy Rollins, PHI (294/344/531, .290 EQA, 11 FRAA, 30 HR, 49 BB, 716 ABs, 66.1 VORP)
Prince Fielder, MIL (288/395/618, .324 EQA, -16 FRAA, 50 HR, 90 BB, 573 ABs, 69.1 VORP)
Matt Holliday, COL (340/405/607, .318 EQA, 14 FRAA, 36 HR, 63 BB, 636 ABs, 75.0 VORP)
Chase Utley, PHI (332/410/566, .321 EQA, 8 FRAA, 22 HR, 50 BB, 530 ABs, 68.8 VORP)
The only argument that can push Rollins, a vastly inferior hitter, past the other people on this list is his defense, baserunning, and "hustle." As for hustle, you can throw that right out the window; hustle is great, but it's better when you're backing it up with something. If it were a photo finish between these guys, maybe then I'd give Rollins extra credit for showing up early at the ballpark and passing the butter without being asked. And as far as being an everyday player, note that when you take walks into account, Rollins only has about 60 more plate appearances than Wright. That's a significant number, but no enough to bridge the gap in batting.
As for defense and baserunning, Rollins is good, I grant you. But so is Wright, and Rollins's edge is once again not enough to bridge the huge gap in VORP.
So yeah, if you believe in fairies, wishing on a falling star, and the magic of good intentions, then Jimmy Rollins is your MVP. Otherwise, it's a close race between several other guys, with David Wright the guy I would pick.
It is pretty close between Wright and Utley, and I wouldn't get too upset if Utley won (he won't -- Rollins will). But Prince Fielder, home runs and happiness aside, doesn't cut it. Sum up his offense, and he's even with the other guys (look at the EQA). Which means that, overall, he's not nearly as valuable, since he's a first baseman (Wright plays third, Utley second, Rollins short) and he's a dreadful defender at that. Kudos to Prince and all, but he shouldn't win the MVP.
Matt Holliday gets a big atta-boy, but he's not the MVP. VORP is actually kinder to him than I would be. EQA sees through the Coors Field effects, and although his defensive numbers are good, everything I've seen and heard suggests that this is an aberration.
Speaking of EQA, none of the players I've mentioned so far led the league in EQA. They were all close, but this fellow actually paced the NL in hitting, all told:
Chipper Jones, ATL: 337/425/604, .340 EQA, -3 FRAA, 29 HR, 82 BB, 513 ABs, 76.0 VORP
Chipper won't win the MVP, and I don't think he should, but is he really getting the appreciation he deserves? He missed time due to injury, but not so much as he has in recent years. He's still an elite offensive player, but he's not going to top 150 games or play a good third base. But he's a lot better than people think. One writer suggested that a way to give Scott Boras a stroke was to make the case that Alex Rodriguez is just the AL version of Chipper Jones. That's not quite true, but the two are close enough that it pokes a big hole in Boras' theory of A-Rod as one-of-a-kind.
And let me address Hanley Ramirez. VORP suggests that, considering that he plays shortstop, he was the most valuable hitter in the National League. Ramirez hit 332/386/562 in a very tough hitter's park while playing an elite defensive position. In most years, that's an automatic MVP.
Except that Ramirez is a terrible, terrible defensive shortstop. Is that enough to knock him down a peg? I think so. I'm not going to dismiss him like so many others have, but consider this: VORP takes defensive position into account, but it does not account for how well you play the position. WARP does take defensive skill into account, though. Viz:
WARP1: D. Wright (10.6), M. Holliday (9.7), C. Utley (9.3), J. Rollins (9.2), C. Jones (9.1), H. Ramirez (8.9), P. Fielder (6.8)
This puts Fielder's MVP case into perspective. I still don't see what the stat sees in Matt Holliday, except perhaps his odd defensive numbers. Regardless, David Wright is still a clear winner.
1. David Wright, New York Mets
2. Chase Utley, Philadelphia Phillies
3. Hanley Ramirez, Florida Marlins
4. Jimmy Rollins, Philadelphia Phillies
5. Albert Pujols, St. Louis Cardinals
6. Chipper Jones, Atlanta Braves
7. Matt Holliday, Colorado Rockies
8. Miguel Cabrera, Florida Marlins
9. Prince Fielder, Milwaukee Brewers
10. Mark Teixeira, Atlanta Braves
AL Cy Young: C.C. Sabathia
As I see it, this case comes down to Sabathia .vs. Beckett. And while there are a lot of considerations to take into account, here's the most important point: Sabathia threw 241 innings (leading the league) to Beckett's 200.2. Granted, in the postseason, the Indians may have regretted riding Sabathia so hard, but during the regular season, 40.1 innings is a lot, especially when two candidates are otherwise pretty close. ERA-wise, Sabathia leads (3.21 to 3.27), but that lead is nullified when you take into account Fair Run Average (Beckett leads 3.47 to 3.55). Beckett had a better strikeout rate, whereas Sabathia had a better walk rate.
I wouldn't cry if Beckett won the award, but I keep coming back to that 40+ innings. That's a lot, and I think it outweighs Beckett's slight edge in effectiveness.
Some other notes: Johan Santana has an off year and still finishes 3rd in my rankings . . . John Lackey and Kelvim Escobar are both better than people appreciate . . . Erik Bedard may well have won the award had he stayed healthy. He still makes the top 10 list.. . . I keep asking this question: where is the love for Javier Vazquez?
1. C.C. Sabathia, Cleveland Indians
2. Josh Beckett, Boston Red Sox
3. Johan Santana, Minnesota Twins
4. John Lackey, Los Angeles Angels
5. Dan Haren, Oakland Athletics
6. Fausto Carmona, Cleveland Indians
7. Erik Bedard, Baltimore Orioles
8. Kelvim Escobar, Los Angeles Angels
9. Javier Vazquez, Chicago White Sox
10. Scott Kazmir, Tampa Bay Devil Rays
NL CY Young: Jake Peavy
This one wasn't nearly as difficult. Peavy walks away with the pitcher's Triple Crown -- leading the league in wins (19), ERA (2.54), and strikeouts (240). And in most categories, he led by a fair margin. He plays in the friendliest pitcher's park in baseball, but he's still the NL's best pitcher, hands down.
Notes: The Braves' duo of John Smoltz and Tim Hudson were great this year, but I'm not so confident they'll continue that surprising nature next season . . . Giants fans don't need to panic: Matt Cain is here.
1. Jake Peavy, San Diego Padres
2. Brandon Webb, Arizona Diamondbacks
3. John Smoltz, Atlanta Braves
4. Roy Oswalt, Houston Astros
5. Tim Hudson, Atlanta Braves
6. Brad Penny, Los Angeles Dodgers
7. Aaron Harang, Cincinnati Reds
8. Cole Hamels, Philadelphia Phillies
9. Matt Cain, San Francisco Giants
10. Jeff Francis, Colorado Rockies
AL Rookie of the Year: Dustin Pedroia
This was a pretty close race, as no one was excellent, but several people were pretty darn good. I guess you could say that I took the easy way out with Pedroia, the everyday player on the World Champions (and the guy who won the thing, as it turned out). Pedroia's challengers aren't hitters; the best non-pitcher rookie other than Pedroia was Brendan Harris of the Devil Rays. Delmon Young, amassed his counting numbers just because he managed to make it to the ballpark every day without falling down a manhole. I have Young ranked 12th among AL right fielders; he hit 288/316/408, sporting a 26:127 BB:K ratio and some "I'm still learning" numbers defensively.
As for the pitchers, there's about half a dozen decent candidates, starters and relievers. And if I were a brave man, I might have cast my (symbolic) Rookie of the Year vote for one of these guys:
Brian Bannister, KCR: 3.87 ERA (4.14 FRA), 165 IP, 34.9 VORP
Jeremy Guthrie, BAL: 3.70 ERA (4.41 FRA), 175.1 IP, 38.2 VORP
But instead, this pitcher took the #2 slot on my AL ROY ballot:
Daisuke Matsuzaka, BOS: 4.40 ERA (4.27 FRA), 204.2 IP, 37 VORP
Looks like a pretty close comparison, right (Look especially at the FRA rather than the ERA). The thing that made up my mind was this:
Bannister, KCR: 44 BB, 77 K
Guthrie, BAL: 47 BB, 123 K
Matsuzaka, BOS: 80 BB, 201 K
There are a million other numbers we could look at, yes. But I think that Matsuzaka, with the significant advantage in innings pitched and strikeouts (especially considering that his ERA isn't as unsightly as it looks), is the man here.
1. Dustin Pedroia, Boston Red Sox
2. Daisuke Matsuzaka, Boston Red Sox
3. Jeremy Guthrie, Baltimore Orioles
4. Brian Bannister, Kansas City Royals
5. Rafael Perez, Cleveland Indians
NL Rookie of the Year: Troy Tulowitzki, Colorado Rockies
Boy, I spent a lot of time thinking about this one. Yes, I'm very well aware that although Tulowitzki is an excellent shortstop, he's not that much of a hitter -- especially considering Coors Field. And I'm also aware that Braun is a potent offensive force that would make Tulowitzki look like Rafael Belliard.
But the defensive gulf between the two players is huge. Tulo is so good -- and Braun is so bad -- that this is one of those rare cases where a significantly superior offensive player is felled by his horrible defense.
I could understand voting for Braun (and I'm not gnashing my teeth that he won the award), but I think that, all things considered, Tulo was more valuable, especially -- and this is important -- because he racked up nearly 200 more plate appearances. That's a lot.
1. Troy Tulowitzki, Colorado Rockies
2. Ryan Braun, Milwaukee Brewers
3. Hunter Pence, Houston Astros
4. Manny Corpas, Colorado Rockies
5. Tim Lincecum, San Francisco Giants
AL DHL Delivery Man of the Year:
1. J.J. Putz, Seattle Mariners
2. Joe Nathan, Minnesota Twins
3. Jonathan Papelbon, Boston Red Sox
NL DHL Delivery Man of the Year:
1. Heath Bell, San Diego Padres
2. Takashi Saito, Los Angeles Dodgers
3. Carlos Marmol, Chicago Cubs
AL Manager of the Year: Terry Francona, Boston Red Sox
Push-button manager? Not really. Even though it wasn't a surprise that the Red Sox won, that doesn't mean that Francona was some innocent bystander. I think he's going to be winning for some time to come.
1. Terry Francona, Boston Red Sox
2. Mike Scioscia, Los Angeles Angels
3. Eric Wedge, Cleveland Indians
NL Manager of the Year: Bob Melvin, Arizona Diamondbacks
It seems too easy for me to pick the guy whose team was the most unlikely winners. But there were several signs that Melvin was indeed pushing the buttons that drove the team to its unlikely division title.
1. Bob Melvin, Arizona Diamondbacks
2. Manny Acta, Washington Nationals
3. Lou Pineilla, Chicago Cubs
AL Executive of the Year: Mark Shapiro, Cleveland Indians
Shapiro becomes the first repeat winner of this award, having taken it home in 2005 as well. His plans came to fruition this year with a postseason appearance, and every indication that they'll be back for the next 2-3 years. Cleveland is another franchise that deserves an award for the entire organization.
Cashman had a very good year, as he asserted his youth plan and even avoided making any big, entangling free agent deals . . . well, except for Roger Clemens, but I doubt he had much say in that. Cashman, when left to his own devices, seems to be a very able GM and having survived for so long under the New York spotlight and under the thumb of multiple Steinbrenners, he's earned his fair share of recognition.
I was tempted to put in Theo Epstein as the #3 man, but then I think of Julio Lugo, Joel Pineiro, and the $50 million+ bid on Daisuke. Those weren't his decisions alone, but he does bear a good deal of responsibility for him. I'm actually not as down on the J.D. Drew deal as some people are, but it still can't really be called a positive mark on his record.
1. Mark Shapiro, Cleveland Indians
2. Brian Cashman, New York Yankees
3. Dave Dombrowski, Detroit Tigers
NL Executive of the Year: Kevin Towers, San Diego Padres
I believe that there's just one award given for both leagues, but here I'll just split it up for both leagues, because .. well, because I can.
Hey, I'm not his bigest fan, but a lot of the other candidates had at least one big blot on their record. Gillick did a pretty good job of pushing the Phillies into the postseason, but then you also have to account for Adam Eaton. Byrnes gets a nod, even though the Diamondbacks' revival was due to a great number of people. Towers did a pretty good job, cobbling together spare parts (Bradley, Ensberg, etc.) to make something happen. The Kevin Kouzmanoff trade paid off, relatively speaking, as did the Greg Maddux signing. The only real personnel move that didn't work out was the pick-up of Marcus Giles. And even then, Giles' disappearance was hard to predict, and he cost very little anyways.
1. Kevin Towers, San Diego Padres
2. Pat Gillick, Philadelphia Phillies
3. Josh Byrnes, Arizona Diamondbacks.
And in my next entry, the 3rd Annual Whiz Kid Awards
(exclusive to this web site ... I think . . . )

Friday, November 09, 2007

Offseason news

There's a lot of news, so let's categorize.
PERFORMANCE ENHANCERS
  • A new report has come out listing former Giants third baseman Matt Wiliams, among others, as having received steroids and/or other PEDs. Maybe we can finally, finally admit that the good guys used PEDs, too. And instead of throwing a sportswriter hissy-fit and sulking and pouting in public, let's just accept that our melodramatic, overwraught attempts to cast the PED scandal in black and white terms is infinitely inaccurate.
  • George Mitchell has set this Saturday (tomorrow) as the deadline for any new evidence or information to include in the Mitchell Report. My guess is that this means we're going to get the report before Christmas. Ho, ho, freakin' ho.
  • This brings me to my next point . . .
COLLUSION
  • The Player's Union is paranoid about collusion, and there is more and more evidence mounting up that their fears are not entirely without merit. With the GMs meeting in Orlando, a lot of people have been wondering if there will be any sort of attempt to collude either against A-Rod or Scott Boras in general. But even more interesting is this little excerpt from the linked column:

    "General managers, in an innovation, each spoke at their annual meeting Tuesday about their offseason goals, and many mentioned what players they were making available. The idea was suggested by this year's co-chairs, Boston's Theo Epstein and Florida's Larry Beinfest, and many GMs said they found it to be useful."

    Well, this sounds more than a little inappropriate. And, if you've read this book, eerily familiar . . .
TRANSACTIONS
  • Braves trade Edgar Renteria and to the Tigers for pitcher Jair Jurrjens and Gorkys Hernandez.
    The Braves can save money by moving Renteria, with Yunel Escobar and Brent Lillibridge ready to take over shortstop. Jurrjens is a prospect, but doesn't really have star potential. That's fine for the Braves, who have stars (Smoltz, Hudson), but no one to back them up. And since #3 starters will make a fortune on the market, and even #4 starters (Kyle Lohse) will be raking it in, acquiring Jurrjens is a handy solution. And Hernandez, while still a bit raw, is a viable center field prospect.
    The Tigers fill a big hole (with Carlos Guillen moving to first base). The 2008 combination of Renteria-Guillen should be more productive and more valuable than the 2007 combo of Guillen-Sean Casey. Age is a facto here, but at least the Tigers will get some cash from Atlanta to cover Edgar's salary. The Tigers already have enough young pitchers and a few still coming up, which makes a mid-level prospect like Jurrjens expendable in the right deal. All in all, a pretty good trade for both teams.
  • Brewers decline 2008 option of Geoff Jenkins.
    This can't be a fun part of a GM's job, but Jenkins' option was just too expensive for a team whose #1 priority is pitching, with a number of corner outfield alternatives.
  • Reds exercise options on Adam Dunn, Scott Hatteberg & Javier Valentin; decline option on Eddie Guardado
    I like Scott Hatteberg and all, but the Reds' outfield situation is intolerably crowded. If Scott Hatteberg and Joey Votto are sharing time at first base (which I REALLY hope is the case), that leaves room for 3 outfield spots. Dunn and Ken Griffey, Jr. would (presumably) have a spot guaranteed. So that's exactly ONE lineup slot for Josh Hamilton, Ryan Freel, Jay Bruce, and Norris Hopper, for starters. The Reds really need to explore a trade. Dunn would be the most marketable commodity, with two years left on his option at a reasonable price for a left-handed masher. I've heard rumors about Griffey being traded, but to me those seem highly unlikely. He is in the last year of his contract, but it's still a silly contract, and he's not going to hold down center field (in Atlanta, for example) for more than 120 games. And since he's getting older and losing offense, he's not the best corner outfield option out there -- not by a long shot.
    The other thing to consider is that the best value -- and maybe even the best player -- of the lot is young Jay Bruce. But with Wayne Krivsky GMing and Dusty Baker managing, Bruce's chances of breaking into the starting lineup aren't so promising -- not unless someone on high declares him a starter by executive fiat. Making room for Bruce should be top priority -- and you can even shed some payroll in the process. It sounds so easy that I don't think the Reds will actually do it. With Dusty managing, look for Ryan Freel and Norris Hopper to get far more playing time than their performance merits.
  • Blue Jays re-sign Matt Stairs to a 2-year contract.
    This pretty much guarantees that the Blue Jays are going to stick with what they have, even if that means staying in the 85-win rut for the foreseeable future. It's not that Stairs isn't valuable, but as part of the big picture, it's clear that this franchise will only makes the postseason if the teams in front of them crash and burn.
  • Yankees pick up 2008 option on Bobby Abreu.
    Well, who wouldn't want to pay an extra outfielder $16 million? Seriously, the Yankees have an overcrowded outfield, and the simplest solution would have been to just decline Abreu's option. They could still have negotiated with him as a free agent, but paying a no-longer-elite player that much money to fill a hole that doesn't exist puzzles me.
  • Red Sox pick up 2008 options on Tim Wakefield and Julian Tavarez. Re-sign Curt Schilling to 1-year, incentive-laden deal.
    Wakefield, I understand. He's not much better than average, but he's a legitimate, reliable, versatile innings-eater making $4 million for one year. That's always a good deal. But with Wakefield (and now Schilling, signed to a good deal), why do you need Tavarez? With Buchholz and Lester looking to move into the starting rotation in 2008, they join Josh Beckett, Schilling, and Daisuke Matsuzaka as one of the very best rotations in baseball. Wakefield is a valuable insurance policy, spot starter, and reliever. So why spend money on a 7th starter who's below-average in most regards? Are they planning on using him as a middle reliever? Are they so paranoid about their starters that they need an insurance policy for their insurance policy? This isn't such a bad move, really, but it does puzzle me.
  • Astros trade Brad Lidge and infielder Eric Bruntlett to Phillies for Michael Bourn, Michael Costanzo, and Geoff Geary.
    The reaction to this deal has been very mixed. My own personal feeling is that Lidge's value was at its lowest, and the Phillies picked up a legitimately good closer for very little. The disagreement, though, is about how much the Phillies gave up. Michael Bourn is a fast guy, but is average, at best, as a hitter. He's not a bad starting center fielder, but I don't see him as an irreplaceable part. Costanzo has promise as a third baseman, but that promise doesn't seem to be as a star, and it's not immediate. The Phillies, more than most other NL team, are built to win now, and there's little point in saving decent players for 2010, when they're not likely to make a big difference anyhow.
    But that all depends on your point of view. Baseball Prospectus writers have weighed in as feeling the Phillies made a big mistake in giving up so much. But I don't see such a rosy future for Bourn and Costanzo. As for the Astros, they're not contending in 2008 anyhow, so they might as well do what they can.
FRONT OFFICE/MANAGERIAL CHANGES
(I've already covered some of those, but bear with me)
  • Jon Schuerholz resigns as Braves GM to take over as team president. Frank Wren takes over as the new GM.
    As I said before, this is the end of an era. Considering the change in ownership and the fact that Bobby Cox won't be around forever, this is a pretty big deal. I hate to say it, but the Braves -- as I knew them -- will soon no longer exist.
  • Dusty Baker takes over as Reds manager.
    If Dusty succeeds, it will be in spite of himself.
  • Ed Wade replaces Tim Purpura as Astros General Manager.
    I'm not so fond of Wade's abilities as a talent evaluator/baseball ops man. I also don't think that he has the authority to stand up to Drayton McLane and start a rebuilding process. Because if this franchise doesn't take aggressive steps to rebuild from the ground up, they're going to ruin what has been a generally impressive 25-year run of baseball.
  • Neal Huntington takes over as Pirates GM; John Russell is hired as manager; most front-office positions turned over.
    I always hesitate to say that a team has nowhere to go but up, because I'm so often wrong. But with this franchise, it really is true. Huntington seems to know what he's doing and what he needs to do.
  • Tony LaRussa teases, but ends up staying on as Cardinals manager. GM Walt Jocketty is fired and replaced by interim GM John Mozeliak, who gets the job on a permanent basis a few weeks later.
    If there is a villain here, I think it's Bill DeWitt. Walt Jocketty is/was one of the best GMs in the game of baseball, and while I can't say that he's perfect, it's hard for me to see how the Cardinals are better without him. The Cardinals have more stability in their rebuilding process, but they still need to revitalize their farm system and improve their quality of free agent signings.
  • Dodgers hire Joe Torre as manager. Don Mattingly and Larry Bowa follow Torre from New York to fill out his coaching staff.
    I've expressed my mixed feelings about Joe Torre before, and suffice to say, this pseudo-mythology isn't an accurate assessment of his potential. I think Torre will be very popular in L.A. I'm not as worried about the quick trigger finger on owner Frank McCourt as some are, simply because Torre is a much bigger star, and McCourt has already aligned most of the baseball media against him.
    I'm worried that Torre and Ned Colletti are a big combination for a franchise that has already shown a terrible ability to utilize young talent and a laughable level of baseball ops acumen. The Dodgers have one of the best development minds in the game (Logan White) and an enviable collection of young talent. Joe Torre might aid in the process of pissing it all away, but in the end the full responsibility won't be on his shoulders.
  • Orioles fire pitching coach Leo Mazzone. Andy MacPhail sort of ends up as the voice of the front office through some vague process.
    MacPhail's been calling the shots for a while, I just like the sound of that. As for Mazzone, his days were probably numbered once his childhood friend Sam Perlozzo was fired as manager. Still, his time in Baltimore cannot be considered much of a success. Most people point to the fact that wild, fireblaling youngster Daniel Cabrera never reached his potential, but I think that's silly; you can't judge any coach by the success or failure of one player. More damning is the fact that the Orioles staff as a whole did not improve their control or maintain their health to any significant degree. This does influence the way we view Mazzone, historically, but I still think he deserves the utmost respect. The real lesson to be learned here is that it was the combination of Mazzone, Bobby Cox, and John Schuerholz that led to such a historically great pitching staff in Atlanta.
  • Yankees fire Joe Torre, hire Joe Girardi.
    I don't have anything new to say about this, except that we've all forgotten just how hard is to be the Yankees' manager.
  • Tampa Bay Devil Rays officially renamed Tampa Bay Rays.
    Whoopty-shi*.
  • Trey Hillman hired to manage Kansas City Royals.
    Yeah, good luck with that.
  • Bill Smith takes over as Twins GM from Terry Ryan.
    Ryan gets a lot of credit as a good GM, and rightfully so. But someone has to point out the team's very poor record at developing and signing good hitters. For all the good things said (and justifiably so) about Minnesota's young pitchers, shouldn't we wonder how good they would have been if somebody had been able to hit worth a damn? Thank God for Joe Mauer.
  • Tony Reagins takes over as Angels GM from Bill Stoneman.
    Maybe I just haven't been listening, but why hasn't this story gotten more than a peep out of the national media? Stoneman and Ryan had similar issues with hitting, but the combination of Stoneman and owner Arte Moreno built one of the best franchises, top to bottom, in baseball.
A-ROD OPTS OUT
That one gets its own column. For now, read this.

Peace out.

Monday, November 05, 2007

Pirate Shi*

Buried in one of Buster Olney's blogs was a reference to a story by Rob Biertempfel in the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. The story is about the Pirates' search for a new manager, and it includes some comments by team president Frank Coonelly in front of the Sewickley Senior Men's Club. Coonelly made some comments about the new executive staff and the new direction the Pirates were taking. Then, he went on to another topic. I'll let Biertempfel explain:

A group of more than 100 men, many of them World War II and Korean War veterans, listened to Coonelly. Many of them nodded when Coonelly said the Pirates had become undisciplined in recent years.
Coonelly said he especially noticed it during the final home game of the season. When "God Bless America" was played during the seventh-inning stretch, all of the St. Louis Cardinals -- but only two Pirates -- stood at the top of the dugout with the hands on their hearts.
"That was disgusting to me," Coonelly said. "It's an example of the culture that somehow had taken hold here. I believe leadership matters. Loyalty matters. Respect for the game matters."


This comment is offensive to me on two levels. The first is the suggestion that true patriotism is standing on the top dugout step during a baseball game. There are so many ways a person can actively express their patriotism, and I don't put standing up and putting a hand over your heart at the top of the list. You'd think that after several thousand years, we would have learned that it is one thing to put on shows of true dedication and quite another for them to mean anything at all.

This is why I resent the implication of Coonelly and so many others that patriotism is some sort of contest to see who can buy the most bumper stickers, pay the most attention to patriotic songs and find the most articles of clothing with the nation's flag on it. True patriotism is shown through action and day-to-day dedication. While many of those who confuse true patriotism with mindless jingoism may indeed have the country's best interests at heart, it's just as easy for someone to pretend to be patriotic be waving flags and singing songs -- and doing nothing else. And sadly, those people would apparently fool Frank Coonelly into thinking that they're true patriots.

But I'm not here to discuss hollow jingoism or those who believe that flags, songs, and hot dogs are more important than a people and their ideals. No, I'm here to discuss Frank Coonelly's truly offensive suggestion that a lack of patriotism is somehow contributing to the Pirates' problems.

Think about it: if you were to make a list of everything that is wrong with the Pirates today, you could probably come up with several dozen ideas pretty quickly. And in the scheme of things, would an insufficient team presence on the top step of the dugout during the 7th inning stretch really merit a mention? And yet that's exactly what Coonelly has done: he's mentioned it and suggested that it somehow has something to do with the problems within the Pirates organization.

Now, let's be fair: I doubt Frank Coonelly really believes that a greater sense of patriotism would turn the Pirates into the Red Sox. It wouldn't resurrect Honus Wagner, spontaneously generate a farm system, or go back in time and suggest that Cam Bonifay take up gardening. I'm sure that Coonelly is an intelligent enough man to realize that the Pirates' organization is arguably the worst in baseball for several very good baseball-related reasons.

So if he realizes this (and I'm sure he does), why does he insult us by trying to connect the Pirates' woes with some perceived lack of discipline as manifested by inappropriate fealty to the 7th-inning stretch? The obvious answer is that Coonelly was speaking to his crowd; if there was indeed a large contingent of older veterans from foreign wars, it's understandable that you would tell them what they (presumably) would want to hear. I always wonder what a baseball person talks about when they go to those events, except just saying the same thing they say in the newspapers. I guess now I know.

In short, Coonelly is setting a new record for a Pirates executive for scapegoating the team's problems. It's probably the least convincing attempt to scapegoat I've ever come across, but that's what it boils down to. Even if you are someone who believes that true patriotism is measured by deference to symbols and songs, I doubt you would use that to explain away the poor performance of a baseball team.

So, Mr. Coonelly: you say that a lack of attention to "God Bless America" reflects the lack of leadership, loyalty and respect for the game in Pittsburgh? Do you think that more trips to the top step of the dugout would help turn things around? Perhaps you think that the Pirates went into the toilet in 1993 because someone accidentally let their American flag touch the ground and then forgot to burn it afterwards.

Frank, I don't even live in Pittsburgh, and I've had enough excuses for why this team sucks. This team sucks because it's been run at a level of incompetence unmatched in recent baseball history. Sure, there have been worse teams and teams with worse leadership, but those teams rarely maintain their incompetence for 15 years.

Do you want to know why your team sucks, Mr. Coonelly? Would you like a chance to correct your hideously inappropriate misstatement? Here's a start:

DRAFT RECORD: PITTSBURGH PIRATES

XXX (y): John Smith (1,682 G; 822 w/PIT 1994-1996)

XXX indicates draft round; (y) indicates overall pick
Games played include career games, then games and years as a Pirate


1986:

1st (1): Jeff King (1201 G; 894 w/PIT 1989-1996)
2nd (29): Mike Walker (5 G; 0 w/PIT)
6th: Tom Goodwin (1288 G; 0 w/PIT)
10th: Stan Belinda (585 G; 285 w/PIT 1989-1993)
ALSO: Rick Reed, Mike Mordecai, Tommy Shields

King wasn't exactly a franchise player, but he was a good all-around third baseman who stayed with the team for his good years. Goodwin didn't sign with the Pirates. Belinda was the Pirates' closer during their run as NL East Champions (1990-1992) but was just slightly above-average.
And although King was a fine player, it's worth noting that when the Pirates selected him #1 overall, they passed on Gary Sheffield, Kevin Brown, Matt Williams, Kent Mercker, Greg Swindell and Roberto Hernandez.

1987:
1st (2): Mark Merchant (o G)
4th: Wes Chamberlain (385 G; 0 w/PIT)
7th: Mickey Morandini (1298 G; 0 w/PIT)
ALSO: Ben Shelton, Brian Williams, Kurt Knudsen

Not a very good showing, all told. If you can't ANYBODY from one draft year to the majors for more than a cup of coffee, then it's not a good draft. Morandini would have been nice to have, but he didn't sign; the Phillies got him in '88.
1988: Avert Your Eyes
1st (13): Austin Manahan (0 G)
2nd: Keith Richardson (0 G)
3rd: Glen McNabb (0 G)
8th: Tim Wakefield (511 G; 37 w/PIT)

Finally, a success story. King was a success, too, but he was the #1 overall pick, and it's hard to screw that up. Wakefield was a true developmental success story; drafted as a first baseman, Wakefield was converted to the mound. He was slow to get things going until he introduced the knuckleball into his arsenal.
But as much credit as we give the Pirates for drafting and developing Wakefield, we must also note this: Wakefield played for them for two seasons and has been with the Red Sox ever since. Did the Pirates get anything in return? No -- they simply released Wakefield in 1995. Betcha they'd like to have that one back.

1989:
1st (18): Willie Greene (655 G; 0 w/PIT)
2nd (48): Rich Aude (62 G, all w/PIT 1993-1996)
2nd (59): John Hope, P (24 G, all w/PIT 1993-1996)
35th: Steve Cooke, P (104 G; 103 w/PIT 1992-1997)
ALSO: Paul Wagner

Greene was considered to be a fine talent, but he never really rose to his perceived potential. And it should be said that although the Pirates got little out of Greene, they did "win" the trade that sent him to the Expos in exchange for Zane Smith. Smith was great for the Pirates down the stretch in 1990 and gave them good seasons in '91 and '92 as well. So that's a fair deal for a shortstop/third baseman who was never really better than "pretty good." Again, the Pirates weren't doing much with their high-level picks after the first round. Taken after Aude and Hope in the 3rd round were Tim Salmon, Jerry DiPoto, Shane Reynolds, John Olerud, Phil Nevin, and Denny Neagle.
For a 35th-round pick, Steve Cooke was a success. But when you're getting better production after pick #100 than you are before (see 1988), that's an issue.

1990:
1st (5): Kurt Miller, P (44 G, 0 w/PIT)
2nd: Mike Zimmerman, P (0 G)
7th: Kevin Young (1205 G; 1155 w/PIT 1992-1995, 1997-2003)
13th: Brian Shouse (353 G; 6 w/PIT 1993)
15th: Rick White (613 G; 129 w/PIT 1994-1995, 2005)
Not that Miller was any great shakes later in his career, but I hope the Pirates enjoyed 1 year of Steve Buechele, because that's all their 1st-round pick netted them.
Finally, with Kevin Young, the Pirates got a player who would be a starter for more than two years, their first since drafting Jeff King four years earlier. Young was drafted as a third baseman, but eventually shifted to first. His batting line is pretty unimpressive as a first baseman during an offensive renaissance (258/324/438 career), but even more shameful is how long the Pirates kept him at first even after it was clear he wasn't helping anything. But the WORST part is that he made nearly $25 million over his last four seasons in Pittsburgh, a perfect example of giving a lot of money to an INCREDIBLY replaceable player.
And note once again that a pair of decent relievers in the middle rounds of the draft turned out to be more prductive than the Pirates' first 6 picks combined.
To save time, I'll only note those players who actually reached the major leagues. If I had to discuss every high-round Pirates draft pick who never made it out of the minors, we'd be here for a while.

1991: If Nothing Else, Dusty Baker Was Happy
1st (24): Jon Farrell (o G)
7th: Tony Womack (1303 G; 351 w/PIT, 1993-1998)
39th: Dustin Hermanson (357 G; 0 w/PIT)
At what point does your lack of success with first-round picks become a problem?
Womack was a lot more famous than his production merited; he was useful enough, but eventually got traded off to the Diamondbacks once his arbitration salaries started rising. Smart move to get rid of such a mediocre player, but then why draft him in the first place?
As for Hermanson, my guess is that -- with the low round selection -- the Pirates doubted they could sign him. They didn't, and he went to Kent State.
1992:
1st (23): Jason Kendall (1682 G; 1252 w/PIT, 1996-2004)
Finally, finally, FINALLY a truly successful draft pick, the first since Jeff King in 1986. Kendall was an All-Star at a premium defensive position and was a fine hitter. His contract extension was a little much, but that's for a different discussion. And thank God for Kendall, because otherwise, the Pirates struck out in '92.
1993:
1st (34): Jermaine Allensworth (342 G; 238 w/PIT, 1996-1998)
Ah, Jermaine Allensworth. The most important tool is hitting.
Only three other players from the Pirates' '93 draft made it to the majors.
1994:
1st (11): Mark Farriss (0 G)
9th: Jimmy Anderson, P: (122 G; 102 w/PIT, 1999-2002)
46th: Brandon Larson: (109 G; 0 w/PIT)
Larson didn't sign. No other player from the Pirates' '94 draft made the majors.

1995:
1st (10): Chad Hermansen (189 G; 139 w/PIT, 1999-2002)
3rd: Bronson Arroyo, P: (159 G; 29 w/PIT, 2000-2002)
38th: Brandon Larson (109 G; 0 w/PIT)
With Arroyo, the Pirates get the first moderately useful player from the draft in 3 years. Of course, Arroyo didn't become useful until the Pirates lost him to the Red Sox via waivers. To be fair, when the Pirates waived him, Arroyo was almost 26 and looked for all the world like a busted prospect. But still, it reflects poorly on your system when someone thrives immediately upon leaving town.
The Pirates were nothing if not persistent. Again they drafted Larson and again he didn't sign. But it worked out all right, since he never became much of a big-leaguer.

1996:
1st (1): Kris Benson, P (195 G; 126 w/PIT, 1999-2004)
5th: Tike Redman (432 G; 392 w/PIT, 2000-2005)
17th: Mike Gonzalez, P (186 G; 168 w/PIT, 2003-2006)
39th: Josh Bonifay (0 G)

On one hand, Benson is a relative blessing to the Pittsburgh farm system. On the other hand, he had two above-average years from 1999-2000 and has since become an average-ish guy with injury problems. The good news is that the Pirates traded him away before his salary became exorbitant. The bad news is that they got Jose Bautista and Ty Wigginton in return. And once again, the Pirates passed on some pretty good players to take Benson, but none of them were real superstars; the '96 draft's biggest stars have been Eric Chavez and Milton Bradley.
Redman was another toolsy and ultimately useless pick. His 330/374/483 performance as a part-timer in 2003 has extended his shelf-life as a 5th outfielder, but his career batting line is 281/315/386, and that's including the aberrant 2003.
And yes, Josh Bonifay is the son of then-Pirates GM Cam Bonifay. Some baseball traditions never change . . .

1997:
1st (8): J.J. Davis (106 G; 80 w/PIT, 2002-2004)
3rd: John Grabow (271 G w/PIT 2003 - )
30th: Mike Gonzalez (186 G; 168 w/PIT, 2003-2006)
Add Davis to the list of semi-prospect 1st-round flameouts. Still on the board when the Pirates took Davis: Lance Berkman, Chase Utley, Jon Garland, Michael Cuddyer, Jeff Weaver, Aaron Cook, Rick Ankiel, Randy Wolf, Scott Linebrink, Adam Kennedy, Jack Cust.
Well, at least the Pirates are drafting their own crop of decent middle relievers. Just tryin' to look on the sunny side, here. And this time they signed Gonzalez.

1998:
1st (15): Clint Johnston (o G)
17: Dave Williams, P (82 G; 66 w/PIT, 2001-2005)
18: Joe Beimel, P (319 G; 164 w/PIT, 2001-2003)
The Pirates reached a new level of futility when none of their first sixteen draft picks from '98 even reached the majors.

1999:
2nd: Ryan Doumit (219 G w/PIT, 2005 - )
5th: J.R. House (29 G; 6 w/PIT, 2003-2004)
Even though he's 26, Doumit looks like a fairly promising catcher. He's no Jason Kendall, but he is coming off a 274/341/472 season in 83 games. He won't make any All-Star teams, but even a somewhat-reliable everyday player only comes along once every 5 or 6 years in this organization.
Was the MLB Catcher's Union secretly subsidizing the Pirates' draft picks this year? House isn't a bad 3rd-string catcher, but if a 3rd-string catcher is your 2nd-best player taken in any amateur draft, you're in trouble. And as you can see, it wasn't just a fluke performance by the Pirates baseball people.
2000:
1st (19): Sean Burnett, P (13 G w/PIT, 2004)
3rd: Chris R. Young, P (99 G; 0 w/PIT)
20th: Jose Bautista (334 G w/PIT, 2004 - )
25th: Nate McLouth (284 G w/PIT, 2005 - )
26th: Ian Snell (82 G w/PIT, 2004 - )

Burnett is still in the Pirates' system, but he'll be 25 next season and hasn't pitched in the majors since that 13-game cup of coffee in '04.
All right, with Chris Young, that's four quality starters the Pirates drafted from 1986-2000 (Wakefield, Arroyo, and Benson being the others). It would of course, be more promising if they had thrown more than 192 of their 964 career games with the team. Young was traded to the Expos for Matt Herges. ::wince::
The Pirates let Bautista go and, as mentioned before, he came back to them as part of the Kris Benson trade. Bautista is a defensively-challenged, 27-year-old, bad-body infielder with a career 240/329/395 hitting line. And to think this one almost got away . . .
McLouth isn't a bad player to get in the 25th round, but he's also not an everyday starter, but is stretched into the role because . . . well, it's the Pirates.
With Snell added to the mix, this is the deepest Pirates draft in years, which says a lot more about the Pirates than it does about the players involved. Snell isn't young and he isn't great, but he appears to be reliably above-average, and may yet give the Pirates some good, cheap pitching without attracting the Kris Benson price tag.
I should point out that we're entering the point where some still-promising players may not have reached the majors yet, or at least they haven't finished developing.

2001:
1st (8): John Van Benschoten (17 G w/PIT)
3rd: Jeremy Guthrie (48 G, 0 w/PIT)
4th: Jeff Keppinger (122 G, 0 w/PIT)
8th: Chris Duffy (193 G w/PIT, 2005 - )
11th: Stephen Drew (209 G, 0 w/PIT)
20th: Zach Duke (68 G w/PIT, 2005 - )
33rd: Chris Shelton (249 G, 0 w/PIT)

Van Benschoten was promising, or so I'm told, but then his arm went kaboom, and now he's a 27-year-old fringe starter.
Guthrie would be a great fit for the Pirates staff right now, but he didn't sign. The Pirates were the second team to draft Guthrie, and it was the Indians who finally got him to sign after the 2002 draft.
Duffy is a poor man's Nate McLouth. Ouch.
Stephen Drew? Well, kudos at least for aiming high (and sending Scott Boras into a fit of hysterical laughter).
Zach Duke is another solid starting pitcher, and the Pirates actually seem to have gotten a few of those in recent years. I can no longer ignore the relatively good showing the Pirates have gotten from the low rounds of the draft; if only they could do remotely as well with the upper rounds. But based on what I've heard, this poor performance in the early rounds should be at least partially blamed on upper management's reluctance to sign either expensive players or high-ceiling players.
Shelton was lost to the Tigers in the 2003 Rule V Draft. I've heard stories about one Rule V draft -- perhaps it was this one -- where the Pirates left so many good players unprotected that officials from other teams were openly laughing at them during the draft.

2002:
1st (1): Bryan Bullington, P (6 G w/PIT, 2005 - )
7th: Matt Capps, P (165 G w/PIT, 2005 - )
We could say that the Pirates are good at drafting decent middle relievers. But then we'd have to point out that -- relatively speaking -- the EASIEST thing in the world to develop is a decent middle reliever.

2003:
1st (8): Paul Maholm, P (65 G w/PIT, 2005 - )
2nd: Tom Gorzellany, P (46 G w/PIT, 2005 - )
Wait -- with Snell and Duke and now Maholm and Gorzellany, the Pirates are actually developing a -- gasp -- decent, homegrown starting rotation! And there's even the possibility that some of these guys will get better! Sarcasm aside, that's good news for the franchise. But we should also wait to reserve judgment until we get a grip on all the great players the Pirates passed on drafting in these years.
2004:
No one from the team's 2004 draft has reached the majors.

We'll stop there, since few players from the 2005-2007 drafts have reached the majors, and even then it's too early to get a good read on their abilities at the big-league level.

But let's sum up, shall we, the 18 drafts period from 1986-2003:

SUPERSTARS:
Nil

STARS:
Tom Gorzellany?
Jason Kendall
Tim Wakefield

SOLID REGULARS:
Bronson Arroyo
Kris Benson
Willie Greene
Jeff King
Pat Maholm
Ian Snell
Chris Young

USEFUL PARTS:
Stan Belinda
Ryan Doumit
Zach Duke
Mike Gonzalez
Chris Shelton
Tony Womack
Kevin Young

You could quibble with some of the designations. But this is simply an unacceptable haul from 18 years of the amateur draft, especially considering the great number of players who either never played for the Pirates or else were quickly lost to another team. Other than Kendall, the player on the list who got the most money from the Pirates was Kevin Young. Yay team.

So there you are, Mr. Coonelly. I could go on and examine the organizational track record in international scouting, free agency, and the trade market from 1986-2003, but take my word for it that I'd come away with similar conclusions. So the next time you speak publicly about your team's woes and are tempted to draw a corollary with patroitism, please -- don't. Or else I will be back -- with even more statistics.